| || |
| Shadelands Gateway Specific Plan (Proposed)|Application No. Y11-056 (Shadelands Gateway Specific Plan) and
Application No. Y12-071 ("The Orchards" development proposal)
|Applicant: ||Deborah Karbo |
Property Development Centers LLC
5918 Stoneridge Mall Rd.
Pleasanton, CA 94588
|Staff: ||Ethan Bindernagel, Sr. Planner |
T: 925.943.5899 x2250
|Owner: ||Safeway Stores 71, Inc. |
1371 Oakland Bl, Suite 200
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
|Staff: ||Laura Simpson, Principal Planner |
T: 925.943.5899 x2236
Shadelands Gateway Specific Plan
On June 17, 2014, the Walnut Creek City Council passed Resolution No. 14-31 to adopt the Shadelands Gateway Specific Plan, which provided a long-term redevelopment vision for the prominent 25-acre property at the corner of Ygnacio Valley and Oak Grove Roads in the southeast corner of the Shadelands Business Park. Links to the individual chapters of the final adopted version of the document are provided below. If you have any questions regarding the Specific Plan, please contact Ethan Bindernagel, AICP, Senior Planner at (925) 943-5899 x2250, or via email at Bindernagel@walnut-creek.org.
• Chapter 1 - Introduction and Background
• Chapter 2 - Vision
• Chapter 3 - Land Use, Development Policies and Design Guidelines
• Chapter 4 - Transportation
• Chapter 5 - Public Infrastructure and Services
• Chapter 6 - Implementation
Final Environmental Impact Report
On June 3, 2014, the Walnut Creek City Council adopted Resolution No. 14-22 to certify the Final Environmental Impact Report [State Clearinghouse Number: 2013062040] ("FEIR") and adopt the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ("MMRP") for the Shadelands Gateway Specific Plan and The Orchards at Walnut Creek Project. The FEIR comprises the following: the Draft EIR; all comments received during the 45-day public review of the Draft EIR; the City's response to those comments, and the MMRP. (A copy of the Draft EIR and all of its Appendices is provided in the next section)
If you wish to review a hard copy of the FEIR and/or MMRP documents, materials are available at the following locations: a) 2nd Floor of City Hall - 1666 N. Main Street; b) Walnut Creek Library - 1644 N. Broadway; c) Ygnacio Valley Library - 2661 Oak Grove Road. Below are links to the electronic versions of the FEIR and MMRP. Given the sheer size of the document, City staff broke the FEIR and MMRP out into smaller sections to facilitate viewing online and downloading the documents.
• Final EIR - pages 1 - 260
• Final EIR - pages 261 - 402
• Final EIR - pages 403 - 554
• Final EIR - pages 555 - 658
• Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR)
The DEIR was filed with the State Clearinghouse in Sacramento on Monday, January 6, 2014, and was assigned the following State Clearinghouse number: 2013062040.
In order to facilitate online access to the 604-page DEIR, City staff has posted a low-resolution version of document on this site. The lo-res setting may slightly compromise print quality. However, hard copies of the DEIR are available at City Hall on the 2nd Floor.
• Shadelands Gateway Specific Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report (Appendices linked separately below)
• Appendix A - Notice of Preparation and Comments
• Appendix B - Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
• Appendix C - Biological Resources
• Appendix D - Cultural Resources
• Appendix E - Geotechnical
• Appendix F - Hazards & Hazardous Materials
• Appendix G - Hydrology & Water Quality
• Appendix H - Noise
• Appendix I - Public Services
• Appendix J - Traffic
• Appendix K - Urban Decay
• Appendix L - Final Draft Specific Plan (provided below)
If you have questions related to the environmental report, please contact:
Ethan Bindernagel, AICP
Planning Division, 2nd Floor
1666 N. Main Street
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
(925) 943-5899 x2250
If you decide to challenge in court the environmental document or other actions of the City pertaining to the Project, you may be limited to raising only those issues addressed at the public hearings described above or in written correspondence received by the City of Walnut Creek, Community Development Department at or prior to those hearings. For further information please contact Ethan Bindernagel, AICP, Senior Planner at (925) 943-5899 x2250, or via email at Bindernagel@walnut-creek.org.
Economic Analysis Documents
The following documents comprise the economic analysis performed prior to the completion of an urban decay analysis conducted by the City's consultant, ALH Urban & Regional Economics, as provided in Appendix K of the Draft Environmental Report and included in the Final Environmental Impact Report. (A link to Appendix K is located above within the Draft EIR section.) BAE urban economics was the City's economics consultant who produced the initial market demand analysis for the Specific Plan. The City then commissioned a peer review with Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) to critique the initial report. BAE was then provided an opportunity to respond to that peer review. The final document is a memo from the City's Economic Develompent Manager, Ron Gerber, to the Planning Commission regarding the potential impacts of development on the 25-acre Plan Area.
• BAE Market Demand Study
• EPS Peer Review of Market Demand Study
• BAE Response to EPS Peer Review
• City Memo to Planning Commission re: Potential Market Impact of Proposed Retail at Shadelands
Shadelands Gateway Specific Plan FAQs
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQs): FAQs about Specific Plan and FAQs about Traffic (only)
SHADELANDS GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN: Revised Planning Principles
|Advisory Committee Members |
|Committee Co-Chairs ||Bob Simmons, Mayor ||Applicant ||Deb Karbo, Property Development Centers |
| ||Kish Rajan, Mayor Pro Tem ||Business Park Representative ||Michael Monaldo, John Muir Health |
|Planning Commission ||Bob Pickett ||Local Business Owner ||Rocco Biale, Rocco's Pizzeria |
|Design Review Commission ||David Crawford ||Residents ||Ted Angus, At-Large |
|Transportation Commission ||Kevin Wilk || ||Eric Harrison, Northgate |
| || || ||Ed Wohlers, The Woodlands |
Advisory Committee Public Meeting Dates
Specific Plan History:
In April 2011, the City Council discussed, among other topics, current economic conditions in the Shadelands Business Park. Council members acknowledged that there are currently several successful, valuable businesses within the Shadelands, but pondered future alternative land uses that might revitalize the business park to make it a more competitive economic development engine and a force within the commercial real estate market. Council members discussed alternatives to the permitted uses within the Business Park for the Safeway site, including but not limited to, senior housing or residential care facilities, educational institutions, medical offices, and a large grocery store complex.
In May 2011, Safeway Stores Inc., as the owner and applicant, submitted a Pre-Application request for the City Council to consider an amendment of the existing General Plan land use designation (GPA) from Business Park (BP) to General Retail (G-R). A GPA would be required to allow the site to be rezoned to one or more compliant retail zoning districts, which would permit construction of a variety of retail uses on all or a portion of the site. The applicant filed the Pre-Application request to determine if the City Council believes the time is right to consider/study possible development of non-business park related land uses on this site.
On August 2, 2011, the City Council reviewed a pre-application for a GPA filed by Property Development Centers (PDC), and endorsed the idea of processing a GPA through the creation of a specific plan. Given the site’s prominent location and the opportunity presented, one of the Council’s intended goals was to ensure the process is inclusive and participatory so that the project incorporates the public’s vision for a future use(s) at this prominent corner identified in General Plan 2025 as a gateway to the City. The City Council also expressed a goal of balancing the needs of the community with those of the applicant in order to create a viable, competitive vision for the future of the 25-acre area. The Council reiterated its commitment to an inclusive public process, one in which the interests of all parties may be expressed, considered, and vetted through an open, public dialogue.